Creativity Whacks to the Head – Roger von Oech

by Marelisa · Comments

Creativity - Roger von Oech

Roger von Oech is an internationally-recognized creativity consultant who has worked with major companies from around the world, including Anheuser-Busch, General Foods, Hallmark Cards, Hewlett-Packard, NASA and Procter & Gamble. He’s also the founder and president of “Creative Think”, a consulting firm that specializes in stimulating creativity and innovation.

His book, “A Whack on the Side of the Head”, is a classic in the field of creativity and innovation and is now on its 25th Edition. In addition, he’s written two more excellent books on creativity–“A Kick in the Seat of the Pants” and “Expect the Unexpected (or You Won’t Find It): A Creativity Tool Based on the Ancient Wisdom of Heraclitus”–and has created other products to help stimulate idea generation, including creativity card decks and “The Ball of Whacks”.

Below you will find some of Roger’s methods and techniques for stimulating creativity; that is, for whacking you on the side of the head and kicking you in the seat of the pants. :-)

A Whack on the Side of the Head

A “whack” is something that stimulates us to think differently. Sometimes we all need a “whack on the side of the head” to break us out of our habitual thought patterns, so that we can look at problems in a fresh new way.

Roger’s book, “A Whack on the Side of the Head” identifies 10 “mental locks” which limit or even preclude creative thinking:

  • The Right Answer;
  • That’s Not Logical;
  • Follow the Rules;
  • Be Practical;
  • Play Is Frivolous;
  • That’s Not My Area;
  • Avoid Ambiguity;
  • Don’t Be Foolish;
  • To Err Is Wrong, and
  • I’m Not Creative.

The book is filled with provocative puzzles, anecdotes, exercises, metaphors, cartoons, questions, quotations, stories, and tips designed to systematically break through your mental blocks and unlock your mind for creative thinking. Here’s an example on breaking the rules when necessary instead of rigidly adhering to them:

In the year 333 B.C., Alexander the Great from Macedonia arrived in the ancient City of Gordium. While there he heard of the legend of the Gordion knot: whoever was able to untie the complicated knot would become the king of Asia.

Intrigued, Alexander asked to be taken to the knot in order to make an attempt at untying it. He tried unsuccessfully to untie it for a few minutes, and then he stepped back and asked himself: “How can I untie this knot?”

At this point, he got an idea. He pulled out his swords and sliced the knot in half. Asia was fated to him.

Blindly following rules has two main detriments: the first, is that we can get locked into strategies and ways of doing things that may not be the most appropriate. And second, we may be facing a situation in which the circumstances in which the rule was created have changed, so the rule is no longer applicable; yet we keep applying it because we fail to analyze the reason for and the validity of the rule.

Look Within for Change Instead of Blaming Others

Another lesson from “A Whack on the Side of the Head” is to look within for change instead of blaming others.  Roger von Oech explains that he conducted a seminar with the direct sales force of a large pharmaceutical company. Prior to the session, he had the opportunity to talk to the people in the bottom 25% of the sales force and he asked them why they weren’t more successful. They answered with comments such as:

“Our products cost too much.”

“I’ve got a crummy territory.”

“I don’t get along with my manager.”

Roger then writes: “What was their problem? They weren’t taking responsibility for their own performance. They spent their time creating excuses rather than thinking of innovative sales solutions.”

The successful salespeople, instead, did not wait passively for outside circumstances to favor them. Instead, if they were turned down, they would simply start looking for alternative ways to make the sale. They saw change as something that resided within themselves and which they could achieve by being proactive.

A Kick in the Seat of the Pants

In “A Kick in the Seat of the Pants”, Roger von Oech tells the story of Jack.  When Jack wasn’t given the promotion he was after, he realized that he hadn’t been performing very well at work lately and that his once perceptive mind was producing trite solutions to important problems. He decided to go to an idea doctor for help.

When Jack arrived at the doctor’s office, the doctor proceeded to ask him some questions.

“First, have you stuck your neck out and taken any risks lately?”

“Not that I can remember,” Jack answered.

“Have you been asking what if . . . ? to stretch your imagination?”

“I’ve been too busy.”

“Have you kept an open mind when evaluating new ideas?”

“I know what works and what doesn’t.”

The doctor’s diagnosis was that Jack was stuck in a rut. He explained to Jack that he had his ends reversed:

“You see, the human body has two ends on it–one to create with and one to sit on. As long as you actively pursue new ideas, your creative end stays in good shape.  But if you sit around doing the same old things, your brain descends into your rear. The result is that your ends get reversed.”

When Jack asked for the remedy to his problem, the doctor stood up, walked over to him, and gave him a swift kick in the seat of the pants. That kick gave Jack the jolt he needed to get his ends realigned.

The Four Players in the Creative Process

In “A Kick in the Seat of the Pants”, Roger von Oech divides the creative process into four different activities or stages: the explorer, the artist, the judge and the warrior.   The explorer and the artist team together for the germination phase which involves right-brain thinking: nonlinear perception, metaphors, dreams, humor and imagination.

The judge and the warrior are then responsible for carrying the ideas into the world of action.  This second phase involves linear, critical, left-brained thinking.  Roger explains that it’s important for the process of creativity to sharpen the skill of all four players. Here’s a closer analysis of the roles played by the explorer, the artist, the judge and the warrior in the creative process:

The explorer searches for raw material with which to create ideas.  We should explore anywhere and everywhere: as we take the dog for a walk, in the museum, at the grocery store, in magazines, and so on. In fact, we should also go outside of our territory and visit places we’ve never been to before and do things we’ve never tried.  The only equipment the explorer needs is an open, curious mind. Exploration should be fun.

The role of the artist is to cultivate, incubate, and manipulate the raw material gathered by the explorer.  The artist asks: “How can I make this idea my own?”  In addition, “what if . . . ?” questions are invaluable to the artist. The artist employs creativity techniques and is not afraid to be wacky and appear ridiculous.

When the judge comes into play it’s time to start giving the ideas the thumbs up or the thumbs down.  While rational analysis and logic can inhibit creativity and kill good ideas if applied at the wrong time, applied at the right time they help ensure that the right ideas go forward into fruition.  When the right idea has been chosen, it’s the warrior’s turn to eliminate excuses, do the necessary work, and implement the idea.  If the warrior fails to execute the idea, the idea dies.

Stimulating Creativity With Constraints and Limits

While thinking “outside the box” is often used as a synonym for creativity, thinking “inside the box” with limitations of time, money and other resources often helps the mind to focus and respond with innovative solutions to problems. In an interview published on “Heads up! on Organizational Innovation”, Roger explains that constraints force the innovator to think and look more deeply for opportunities.

As an example, he explains that he was watching a Roman Polanski’s 1962 film, “Knife in the Water”.  One of the DVD’s special features had an interview with Polanski and his screenwriter in which they both stated that they forced themselves to stick with Aristotle’s “three unities for a good tragedy”:

  • All action takes places within 24 hours;
  • All action occurs in the same place; and
  • There is a limited number of characters

This made them think more deeply about plot and character rather than taking cinematic shortcuts.  That is, these three limits helped them create a much better film than they would have put together had they not set any limits.

In addition, Roger explains that in writing his creativity card decks he was forced  to get his point across using precise, carefully chosen words due to the limited space on each card.  When it came time to developing his Ball of Whacks–a creativity tool for innovators–, he set a budget as a constraint instead of simply pouring open-ended amounts of money into the project, which would probably have resulted in unnecessary, cumbersome features being added.

Conclusion

In an interview Roger von Oech gave to entrepenuer, venture capitalist, and blogger Guy Kawasaki, he explained that his mantra is: “ “Look for the Second Right Answer.”  This opens his mind and pushes it to go beyond the obvious and to continue looking for even better solutions to problems.  This mantra also helps him avoid falling in love with any one particular approach and encourages him to use failed ideas as a springboard to explore a different path for reaching a solution.

If you would like to read more about Roger von Oech, head on over to my Squidoo lens: “Roger von Oech”.

Please share in the comments below the methods and techniques you use when you need to be jolted out of conformity and stagnation and get your creative juices flowing.

Creative Commons License photo credit: E. E. Piphanies

Related Posts:

Recommended Product:

Learn to meditate, increase your focus and concentration, boost your creativity, and augment your brain power with the Silva Life System.

    Silva Life System

Did you enjoy this article? Subscribe for free by RSS or e-mail and you’ll always know when I publish something new. (What’s RSS?).

Also, please share it on the social media site of your choice, thank you. :-)

Share and Enjoy:
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • Print
  • Netvouz
  • Sphinn
  • Furl
  • Mare
    The 10 mental locks seem to describe a responsible grown-up that has an important job. It certainly describes most of the people I work with.

    What's really scary to me looking at this list is that most of these are not only taught to us growing up, they are reinforced in our school system and traditional workplaces. I wonder what would happen if we made time in our workdays for recess and art every day?

    <abbr>kathys last blog post..How to Use a Productivity System to be Unproductive</abbr>
  • Great article. I love everything to do with creativity. I try to spark mine every day with small and big things. I try to bring in some creativity at work (I am in sales) which is not easy. I HATE the typical 'think out of the box' sentence. It has tended to become an excuse too. I try to get people to stop what they are doing and get them to do something right brainy so that the left brain leaves the room for a while. They are usually amazed at what they can do.
    Thanks for sharing.

    <abbr>Mindful MImis last blog post..Your talent lies in your choice - Stella Adler</abbr>
  • This is great - and reinforces why I left corporate America - the lack of creativity!

    I'm currently on the board of a networking organization and I'm very much dealing with a lot of these issues - lack of creativity, to strict with the rules, etc. It's frustrating and I'm trying so hard to get people to think in a way that first explores all options before narrowing the focus! Perhaps I'll send them this information!

    Makes sense why the two phrases in my poem resonated with you - accountability is so critical!

    <abbr>Stacey Shipmans last blog post..Reflections, Happy New Year and a Poem</abbr>
  • I love the Ploanski story. One of the most creative things I ever came up with was within limits, really made me stretch my mind.

    Follow the Rules;
    Play Is Frivolous;

    To me those 2 are all-important in life.

    GREAT post!

    <abbr>Jannies last blog post..2 poems, one with pansies</abbr>
  • Jay
    Wow- that top ten mental blocks is the mission statement of every corporation. I think that is why entrepreneurs have such a hard time at typical 9-5 ventures. Their minds are different, they are not willing to see their creative souls for the corner office and heart problems. :-)

    <abbr>Jays last blog post..It is All About Humanity- New Year’s Resoultions for a Better World</abbr>
  • Hi Mare. "Look for the Second Right Answer" -- that is an interesting statement. Questions are probing and the more you ask, the more your perspective is opened. Just ask a life coach :-) Questions open you up to the probings of the unconscious.

    <abbr>Davinas last blog post..Seduced By Snowmen</abbr>
  • Whenever I feel stuck, I leave the house. Being among other people, breathing fresh air, changing pace - these always help me. When I get back home I am energized and full of new ideas.
  • I so enjoy your book reports Marelisa and I think these are things you must be working on yourself to be attracted to them and share them - that speaks well of what you have chosen and the response that they bring out in you and in others.

    I do not usually have problems with the creativity or the intuitive part of a project and I am overly responsible....but I have so much trouble with the linear, mathematical thinking parts, I have always thought I should be apart of a team - yet I usually end up alone on a project with the linear thinker getting all the credit and income.

    Does the author add exercises and puzzles for building up your linear thinking skills in the process or does he just assume we have mastered that in school?

    I think I will get a copy of this book...Thank you for the introduction

    <abbr>Patricias last blog post..Ah Ha!</abbr>
  • I think it is so important to not get stuck on one particular solution. Sometimes what you think is the answer is only the stepping stone towards true success.

    <abbr>Stacey / Create a Balances last blog post..Sending You An Enthuse Muse</abbr>
  • Dot
    I need to be jolted out of linear thinking all the time. I visit sites like yours to get my right brain working again. I also find that cardio exercise gets the creative juices flowing again.

    <abbr>Dots last blog post..This and That</abbr>
  • Mare
    Hi Kathy: I came across an interview of Roger von Oech where he's asked how to prevent schools from taking away the creativity of children. He answered that the best thing to do is lead by example and be creative yourself. It certainly is true that schools--for the most part--suck the creativity out of their students.

    Hi Mimi: I think you're making an important contribution to your work place by encouraging your co-workers to be more right brainy. :-)

    Hi Stacey: I worked for the government for about 5 years, and it was filled with people doing things the way they've always been done just because they couldn't be bothered to stop for a moment and think for themselves. It was so unbelievably frustrating.


    Hi Jannie: Yeah, that Polanski story took me back to high school when we had to read all those Greek tragedies. I've set a schedule of writing on this blog Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, and that constraint forces me to finish writing each of my blog posts.
  • Mare
    Hi Jay: It is a completely different mindset, and it's a mindset that should be taught in school (instead of preparing people to work for others their entire lives).

    Hi Davina: That was a point that Einstein also made often. He said that part of his genius is that he continued looking for solutions when everyone else had already stopped.

    Hi Vered: I get energized by going to the park, visiting my two little nephews, or going to the mall that's within walking distance and having a frapuccino.
  • Mare
    Hi Patricia: Roger's books are more focused on the creativity aspect, and not so much on the linear aspect. That's an interesting question: what could you read to develop the left side of your brain? I have a business degree and a law degree, so left brained activities come naturally to me. I guess that productivity books like "Getting Things Done" and Leo Babauta's new book "The Power of Less" could be helpful. Let me give this some more thought.

    Hi Stacey: Exactly. Sometimes an idea pops into your head and you think: "wow, this is brilliant". Then on closer examination you realize it's not so brilliant, but it acts as a stepping stone to what really is a great idea.

    Hi Dot: Glad to be your whack on the side of the head :-) I jog on a treadmill every weekday and I often get ideas for posts while I'm on there.
  • Thanks for sharing. I had not heard of this author and really enjoyed the review. I can see so much of my past self in the list from Whack on the side of the head in myself.
    Being practical and don't be foolish were a major problem for me. For so long I was proud to be very left brained and analytical. Well actually I didn't think I could be creative until I allowed myself to be. This is one book I know I want to read for myself.

    Linda
  • Another excellent post, Marelisa! When is your book coming out? ;) I'm especially interested in the idea of the explorer, artist, judge, and warrior. I wonder if a lot of writers aren't caught in the explorer loop.

    <abbr>Melissa Donovans last blog post..Writing Forward: Year in Review 2008</abbr>
  • Once again Marelisa, another gem. I am a silva method student and had asked for three things during my meditation-Inspiration, courage and a method. I heard a voice tell me, It will come to you like a brick to your head.
    Thanks for the whack! You are a godsent!!

    <abbr>Elaine B.s last blog post..A Big Thank You!</abbr>
  • Hi Mare,
    The idea of a second right answer - I like it! Especially since getting to a second answer probably really does mean being more creative in our whole thinking process.

    <abbr>Lances last blog post..Think And Grow Rich</abbr>
  • I enjoyed the story of the Gordion knot. It is a good illustration of how thinking out of the box can help generate creative ideas and solutions to what appears to be a complex problem. I'm looking forward to dreaming up more second right answers!

    <abbr>Evelyn Lims last blog post..Law of Attraction Blog Highlights 2008</abbr>
  • My creativity gets stifled when I don't put any rules on myself. I've made the mistake of thinking that I need to just write, think and create as far as my imagination can go, but this actually gives me too many options.

    I like that Roman Polanski put limits to how he would create a movie. This kept his focus razor sharp, allowing him to make brilliant movie.

    When I started my blog I was all over the place - networking with whoever and writing whatever. Without putting rules on my creativity, I went too far. I'm learning what to put my energy into and what gives me the most bang for my time. It's helped me raise my level of success to a new level and understand how to keep it rising.

    <abbr>Karl Staib - Your Work Happiness Matterss last blog post..Day 29 of 30 – No Complaining - Listen to Your Fear</abbr>
  • Have you ever heard of the Tolstoy quote, " Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself?" I think it really helps illustrate your idea of changing what you have "within" before you focus on blaming others.

    It's very easy to shirk accountability to some external force because it makes you feel better, but the truly successful people take accountability for all of their actions. Additionally, if they get taken by surprise by some external factor, they also blame themselves for not planning for it.

    <abbr>Dereks last blog post..Why Einstein Became Immortal (and how your company can join him), Success Factors Day 3</abbr>
  • Slicing the knot in half with a sword is definitely the most economic of choices, not to mention, the most effective too. That's what I would have done. Interestingly, being lazy in this case, would be an asset.
  • Hi Marelisa,

    I'm quite honored that you showcased some of my creativity ideas. Thanks for the shout out. Best wishes to you and your many readers in their creative endeavors!

    Roger von Oech
  • Mare
    Hi Linda: The good news is that when you generate lots of new ideas--now that you're giving yourself permission to be more creative--your analytical side can help you choose the best ones and see them through to completion.

    Hi Melissa: I hope to get started writing it soon :-) That's why it's so important to develop both sides of the brain: you can't really produce anything great without the right side of the brain providing the inspiration and the left side setting down a plan to get things done.

    Hi Elaine: The Silva Method is the best! Glad to have answered your call :-)

    Hi Lance: I think the first answer we come up with is usually closer to what we're used to. Then if continue going forward and looking for more answers and solutions we start departing from the norm and really getting creative.
  • Mare
    Hi Evelyn: I guess there's a reason why Alexander was one of the greatest military commanders that ever lived.

    Hi Karl: I completely agree that constraints are necessary to the create process. Without setting time constraints on myself I would just keep adding more and more to projects and would never actually complete anything.

    Hi Derek: I have heard that quote and I completely agree with you that it's extremely important to take responsibility for yourself and the outcomes that you produce. The more you take responsibility for yourself, the more powerful you are.

    Hi Bamboo: It's interesting that you say that. Many times it's not about working harder and getting more done; it's about looking for the easiest and simplest solution.
  • Mare
    Hi Mr. von Oech: As you can probably tell, I'm a big fan of yours. Thank you for stopping by and leaving a comment :-)
  • Hi Mare. I saw your comment on Twitter about Roger von Oech's comment. That is nice of him to stop by and leave a comment. I bet you were excited! :-)

    <abbr>Davinas last blog post..The Quote Effect: Naughty, Nice & Niche Bloggers</abbr>
  • Hi Mare,

    Thanks for the great post. I also enjoyed your other post The Yin-Yang of Creativity, and after comparing the two posts, I have 3 questions I'd like to hear your comments on:

    1) If it's right that "Creativity is thinking up new things. Innovation is doing new things.", then "the warrior" in Mr. von Oech's 4 creative stages can be left to the "innovation" part, although execution definitely has an impact on idea generation.

    Or, if you categorize the creative process as "free-thinking" and "critical thinking", similar to Yin and Yang, then "the artist" belongs to "free-thinking", while "the explorer", "the judge", and "the warrior" all belong to "critical thinking". Does this make sense? Do you think Yin-Yang is a simpler categorization than the 4 stages, considering your blog also has a main theme on Simplicity :) ?

    2) You said in the Yin-Yang post that - Some creativity techniques are intended to “open your mind” and encourage “free thinking”, such as idea generation and brainstorming sessions. Other techniques create constraints and force your mind to focus, such as setting time deadlines , forcing associations between the problem and a random word..

    Isn't forcing association using random word also one main form of "idea generation"?

    3) Basically, I'm trying to understand/explore the simplest (thus most helpful and user-friendly to ordinary people) categorization of creative thinking. If the formula "creative thinking=free thinking+critical thinking" is correct, then what best and clear techniques there are for "free thinking" and "critical thinking"?

    Thank you for your great site and for your time.
    .-= Jeff Tang´s last blog ..Why, What, and When =-.
  • Marelisa
    Hi Jeff: You'll notice that a lot of these different creativity methods are really saying the same thing, but in different ways. Because you 're right, creativity is coming up with new ideas while innovation is turning those new ideas into reality. The artist and the explorer look for new ideas while the judge and the warrior turn those ideas into reality. Awhile ago I wrote a post about a Japanese inventor who holds more patents than Thomas Jefferson did. He has an elaborate creativity process that starts out in a meditation room where he allows himself to think freely and then he goes into a disco-type room where he forces himself to constrain his ideas. As to which creativity method is most complex, I think it depends on the level of detail you want to go into. If you're more comfortable with the yin-yang approach, that's a great way to look at creativity as well.

    Both techniques that open your mind and techniques that constrain your mind are idea generation techniques. One type works by removing rules, assumptions, and so on, while the other does the opposite: it forces a rule or an element on the situation in order to focus the mind and foster creativity. That is, they both have the same objective but they approach it from the exact opposite direction.

    To me the best type of free thinking that there is, is meditation. It's simply quieting your mental chatter--thoughts about everyday matters--so that you can listen to ideas coming to you from a deeper place inside of you. As for critical thinking, I think it helps to develop a clear set of parameters you're going to apply to each idea in order to choose the best one (for example, cost, time it will take to develop, what those higher-up in the organizational structure might have to say about each idea, and so on).

    I hope this helped, take care, Marelisa
  • Thanks Marelisa for your detailed reply. The story about the Japanese inventor is inspirational, and your summary about the 4 roles makes a lot of sense - I thought the Explorer is like market researcher, collecting and analyzing data to search for new ideas.

    And thanks for sharing about your personal best type of free and critical thinking. Are there particular tools for meditation, such as the random-word-based games introduced by Edward De Bon in his book How to Have Creative Ideas?

    Please correct me if I'm wrong - isn't idea generation the same as free thinking, and idea evaluation critical thinking? Then why "Both techniques that open your mind and techniques that constrain your mind are idea generation techniques"?

    Thanks, Jeff
  • Marelisa
    Hi Jeff: The explorer looks for for new ideas without judging what he/she finds.

    What I use for meditation is the Silva Life System.

    There are two types of idea generation strategies: techniques that open your mind, such as brainstorming, and techniques that limit your mind, such as the random word technique. Free thinking and evauation critical thinking are different things, you're trying to mix up apples and oranges. Constraining techniques are part of the free thinking stage, even though it may seem contradictory. You place a constraint, but you're still not judging at this stage.
  • Hi Marelisa, what you said makes sense, and it's the term "constrain" I think we have different explanations: to me the random word technique is not limiting your mind, but widely liberating it, and I regard evaluative, critical thinking as constraining the mind, trying to limiting ideas to feasible ones.

    Can "constrain" be explained this way, so people may find it less contradictory? Or is the random word technique universally regarded as one of the constraining techniques in the creativity field?
    .-= Jeff´s last blog ..Why, What, and When =-.
  • Marelisa
    Jeff: The term used is constraining, but it's just semantics. If you find it liberating then that's great.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: